Preview

Trudy NAMI

Advanced search

Effectiveness analysis of the automatic emergency braking systems in relation to unprotected participants

https://doi.org/10.51187/0135-3152-2022-1-26-34

Abstract

Introduction (statement of the problem and relevance). The available methods for testing automatic emergency braking systems (AEBS) do not take into account the specific features of Russian operating conditions (lighting, weather conditions, real traffic accidents statistics (RTAS), etc.). Therefore, reasonable adaptation and correction of such methods is of necessity.

The purpose of the study was to develop and test an AEBS effective methodology to prevent a collision with a pedestrian.

Methodology and research methods. The methods of statistical research data and mathematical analysis of road accidents have been applied. Based on the traffic accidents pedestrian collision statistics in 2020, the most common scenarios and pedestrian collision causes in the Russian Federation were determined. Considering these data different types of automatic emergency braking systems (AEBS) tests including the function of preventing collision with pedestrians were proposed. AEBS tests were planned to be carried out in daylight and at night without artificial lighting.

Scientific novelty and results. The scientific novelty of the research is an AEBS system effectiveness assessment when working on “adult pedestrian”. The criterion for evaluating AEBS effectiveness was the maximum speed at which it was possible to prevent a collision with a pedestrian. The final assessment of the action effectiveness was determined when the weighting factor of each type of test was taken into account. The weight coefficients were substantiated by real accident statistics. The results of AEBS testing efficiency for a Toyota RAV4 car, performed according to the developed methodology, have been presented. A parametric record of the field test characterizing the features of the Toyota RAV4 AEBS functioning has been presented as well.

Practical significance. The developed methodology can be taken as the basis for the formation of the Russian national safety rating for new vehicles RuNCAP.

About the Authors

S. R. Kristal’nyy
Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI)
Russian Federation

PhD (Eng), associate professor of the Department “Automobiles”

Moscow 125319



N. V. Popov
Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI)
Russian Federation

PhD (Eng), associate professor of the Department “Automobiles

Moscow 125319



A. N. Andreev
Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI)
Russian Federation

Assistant of the Department “Automobiles”

Moscow 125319



D. V. Sidorov
Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI)
Russian Federation

Postgraduate of the Department “Automobiles”

Moscow 125319



A. Ch. Tilakhun
Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI)
Russian Federation

Postgraduate of the Department “Automobiles”

Moscow 125319



References

1. Ivanov A.M., Kristal’nyy S.R., Popov N.V., Shadrin S.S. [Intelligent driver assistance systems. Technical requirements and test methods: textbook]. Moscow, MADI Publ., 2019. 100 p. (In Russian)

2. Gaysin S.V., Bakhmutov S.V., Endachev D.V., Mezentsev N.P. [The development of advanced (intellectual) driver assistance systems (ADAS) in the Russian Federation]. Trudy NAMI, 2016, no. 265, pp. 6–12. (In Russian)

3. Malinovskiy M.P. [Preconditions for the modern warning and autonomous systems development of traffic control]. Trudy NAMI, 2017, no. 1 (268), pp. 53–59. (In Russian)

4. Kukkala V.K. et al. Advanced driver-assistance systems: A path toward autonomous vehicles. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 2018, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 18–25.

5. SAE J3016:2016 Surface vehicle recommended practice – Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles, SAE International, 2016

6. Endachev D.V., Bakhmutov S.V., Evgrafov V.V., Mezentsev N.P. [Electronic systems of intelligent vehicles]. Mekhanika mashin, mekhanizmov i materialov, 2020, no. 4 (53), pp. 5–10. (In Russian)

7. Ivanov A., Shadrin S., Popov N., Gaevskiy V., Kristalniy S. “Virtual and physical testing of advanced driver assistance systems with soft targets”, 2019 International Conference on Engineering and Telecommunication, EnT 2019 9030527.

8. About Euro NCAP. Available at: https://www.euroncap.com/en/about-euro-ncap/ (accessed 20 January 2022).

9. Vulnerable Road User (VRU) Protection.Available at: https://www.euroncap.com/en/for-en-gineers/protocols/vulnerable-road-user-vru-protection/ (accessed 20 January 2022).

10. [Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to automatic emergency braking systems (AEBS) for vehicles of categories M1 and N1]. Available at: https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/main/wp29/wp29regs/2020/R152r.pdf (accessed 20 January 2022). (In Russian)

11. [Road safety indicators]. Available at: http://stat. gibdd.ru/ (accessed 20 January 2022). (In Russian)

12. ISO/DIS 19206-2 Road vehicles – Test devices for assessment of active safety functions – Part 2: Requirements for pedestrian targets.


Review

For citations:


Kristal’nyy S.R., Popov N.V., Andreev A.N., Sidorov D.V., Tilakhun A.Ch. Effectiveness analysis of the automatic emergency braking systems in relation to unprotected participants. Trudy NAMI. 2022;(1):26-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51187/0135-3152-2022-1-26-34

Views: 285


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0135-3152 (Print)