Preview

Trudy NAMI

Advanced search

Assessment of impact of parameters of passenger transport powertrain based on hydrogen fuel cell on the cruising range

EDN: CIPEEF

Abstract

Introduction (problem statement and relevance). The global transition to the low-carbon economy stimulates development of hydrogen transport. The key advantage of hydrogen fuel cells (FC) over lithium-ion batteries is high specific energy, which potentially extends the cruising range and increases the loading capacity of vehicles. The relevance of the paper is determined by the necessity to optimize hybrid vehicle FC-based powertrains in order to increase their energy efficiency, which depends heavily on the system configuration.

The purpose of the study is to analyze the impact of a hybrid fuel cell based powertrain and traction battery configuration on the vehicle cruising range under conditions of the urban and intercity (highway) driving cycles.

Methodology and research methods. In order to achieve the purpose, a mathematical model of vehicle driving is developed, which includes the powertrain power balance and models of the following components: proton exchange membrane fuel cell, traction battery and hydrogen storage system. The simulation is conducted for the urban and intercity routes with variation of the key powertrain parameters: fuel cell maximum power, traction battery capacity and weight of the hydrogen being transported.

Scientific novelty and results. It is found that the optimum powertrain configuration depends crucially on the route type. For the urban cycle, the maximum cruising range (1433 km) is achieved in case of a configuration with a large-capacity traction battery (40 A·h) and low-power FC (40 kW). For the intercity cycle, the key is to increase the power of fuel cells (up to 160 kW), which allows lowering of requirements for the traction battery and increasing of the weight of the hydrogen transported, providing the cruising range of up to 833 km.

The scientific novelty consists in the method of increasing the energy efficiency of a hydrogen vehicle, taking into account the impact of the weight of components when analyzing various powertrain configurations.

Practical significance. The research results allow development of more efficient configurations of powertrains for hydrogen transport optimized for specific operating conditions. This promotes powertrain weight decrease, cruising range extension and, as a result, increase in economic feasibility and environmental efficiency of hydrogen vehicles.

About the Authors

M. A. Solov’yеv
Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “Bauman Moscow State Technical University”; Lipgart Engineering Center
Russian Federation

postgraduate

Moscow 105005



D. O. Butarovich
Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “Bauman Moscow State Technical University”; Lipgart Engineering Center
Russian Federation

PhD (Eng)

Moscow 105005



References

1. Zhang W., Fang X., Sun C. The alternative path for fossil oil: Electric vehicles or hydrogen fuel cell vehicles // Journal of Environmental Management. – 2023. – V. 341. – P. 118019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118019.

2. Karpukhin K.E., Keller A.V. [Variants of approaches to extend the cruising range of electrified vehicles, and their technical and economic assessment]. Trudy NAMI, 2025, no. 2 (301), pp. 56–66. EDN: RJLCOY. (In Russian)

3. Thomas C.E. Fuel cell and battery electric vehicles compared // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. – 2009. – V. 34, no. 15. – P. 6005–6020. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.06.003.

4. Ajanovic A., Glatt A., Haas R. Prospects and impediments for hydrogen fuel cell buses // Energy. – 2021. – V. 235. – P. 121340. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121340.

5. Biksaleev R.Sh., Karpukhin K.E., Malikov R.R., Klimov A.V., Ryabtsev F.A. [Design peculiarities aspects of electrified vehicles with a combined power unit based on fuel cells]. Trudy NAMI, 2021, no. 1 (284), pp. 47–58. DOI: 10.51187/0135-3152-2021-1-47-58. EDN: JLFZSS. (In Russian)

6. Ahmadi P., Khoshnevisan A. Dynamic simulation and lifecycle assessment of hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles considering various hydrogen production methods // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. – 2022. – V. 47. – Iss. 62. – P. 26758–26769. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.215.

7. Larin V.V. [Theory of motion of all‑wheel drive wheeled machines]. Moscow, Publishing House of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 2010. 392 p. (In Russian)

8. Fakherdinne O., Gharbia Y., Farrokhi Derakhshandeh J., Amer A.M. Challenges and solutions of hydrogen fuel cells in transportation systems: a review and prospects // World Electric Vehicle Journal. – 2023. – V. 14, no. 6. – P. 156. DOI: 10.3390/wevj14060156.

9. Averina Yu.M., Grafov D.Yu., Moiseeva N.A., Rybina E.O. [Fuel cells for environmentally friendly road transport]. Uspekhi v khimii i khimicheskoi tekhnologii, 2018, vol 32, no. 14 (210), pp. 9–12. EDN: YWYSFN. (In Russian)

10. РЕМ fuel cell modeling and simulation using Matlab / ed. Spiegel С. – Burlington–San-Diego–London: Academic Press, 2008. – 443 p.

11. Vorobyov A.A., Vorobyov S.A., Trofimov E.S., Razumov P.A. [Operation of a fuel cell system based on a proton exchange membrane in road transport]. Mir transporta i tekhnologicheskikh mashin, 2024, no. 1-3 (84), pp. 42–48. EDN: VEZJHU. (In Russian)

12. Schröer P., van Faassen H., Nemeth T., Kuipers M., Sauer D.U. Challenges in modeling high power lithium titanate oxide cells in battery management systems // Journal of Energy Storage. – 2020. – V. 28. – P. 101189. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2019.101189.

13. Mekonnin A.S., Wacławiak K., Humayun M., Zhang S., Ullah H. Hydrogen storage technology, and its challenges: a review // Catalysts. – 2025. – V. 15. – No. 3. – P. 260. DOI: 10.3390/catal15030260.

14. Saias C.A., Roumeliotis I., Goulos I., Pachidis V., Bacic M. Assessment of hydrogen fuel for rotorcraft applications // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. – 2022. – V. 47. – Iss. 76. – P. 32655–32668. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.316.

15. Hua T., Ahluwalia R., Peng J.K., Kromer M., Lasher S., McKenney K., Law K., Sinha J. Technical assessment of compressed hydrogen storage tank systems for automotive applications // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. – 2011. – V. 36. – P. 3037–3049. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.090.

16. Xu Z., Zhao N., Hillmansen S., Roberts C., Yan Y. Techno‑economic analysis of hydrogen storage technologies for railway engineering: a review // Energies. – 2022. – V. 15. – No. 17. – P. 6467. DOI: 10.3390/en15176467.

17. Zhou W., Yang L., Cai Y., Ying T. Dynamic programming for new energy vehicles based on their work modes. Part II: Fuel cell electric vehicles // Journal of Power Sources. – 2018. – V. 407. – P. 92–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.10.048.


Review

For citations:


Solov’yеv M.A., Butarovich D.O. Assessment of impact of parameters of passenger transport powertrain based on hydrogen fuel cell on the cruising range. Trudy NAMI. 2026;(2):72-84. (In Russ.) EDN: CIPEEF

Views: 35

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0135-3152 (Print)