The relevance of creating a methodology analysis to assess the passive safety of armored civil vehicles
https://doi.org/10.51187/0135-3152-2021-1-59-67
Abstract
Introduction (problem statement and relevance). At present, there are no international standards for the passive safety of armored vehicles. This means that the developers themselves choose the conditions for conducting crash tests and the requirements for their results.
The purpose of the study was to conduct a brief expert analysis of the historical domestic experience in the fi eld of passive safety, as well as to analyze the applicability of the methods included in the requirements of the UN Regulation and Euro NCAP for the passive safety of the armored civil vehicles.
Methodology and research methods. The crash tests results of armored vehicles ZIS-110SO and ZiL-4105 were analyzed by experts. The analyses included the requirements of regulatory documents concerning the testing of vehicles for passive safety (UN Regulation, Euro NCAP).
Scientifi c novelty and results. It has been established that the armored vehicles ZIS-110SO and ZiL-4105 did not meet the UN Regulation No. 94. It was also found that not all of the UN Regulations and Euro NCAP standards could be applied to assess the passive safety of armored civil vehicles.
Practical signifi cance. In this work, load modes which could be taken as a test matrix basis for armored vehicles have been selected from the regulatory documents. In addition, the inexpediency of using some of the tests was substantiated.
About the Authors
T. A. ViunovRussian Federation
Viunov T.A., postgraduate design engineer of the department of numerical analysis of passive safety
Moscow 125438
D. Yu. Solopov
Russian Federation
Solopov D.Yu., PhD (Eng) head of the department of numerical analysis of passive safety
Moscow 125438
References
1. Euro NCAP. Available at: https://www.youtube. com/channel/UCNEWZqjcguqWZOG8yZZpIFg (accessed 30 April 2020).
2. Kryukovskiy A., Vikulin S. [Wheels of the country of the Soviets. True stories and fables. Film 2. Upper to lower case. 2011]. Available at: https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=nvtfvmADjHI&t=1892s (accessed 30 April 2020). (In Russian)
3. [ZIS-110SO]. Available at: https://www.drive2. ru/b/488983608271307142/ (accessed 30 April 2020). (In Russian)
4. [ZiL-4105]. Available at: https://www.drive2. ru/b/2930024/ (accessed 30 April 2020). (In Russian)
5. UN Regulation No. 94. Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the protection of the occupants in the event of a frontal collision.
6. Justen R., Hermle M., Schöneburg R. et al. The Safety Concept of the Mercedes-Benz GLC F-Cell. ATZ Worldw 121, 68–71 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/ s38311-018-0238-x.
7. Safety Companion 2020: carhs GmbH, 2020. – P. 20–21.
8. UN Regulation No. 95. Uniform provisions concerning the protection of the occupants of vehicles in the event of a lateral collision.
9. Oblique pole side impact. Testing protocol. European new car assessment programme (Euro NCAP), 2019. 26 p.
10. Euro NCAP Side Pole. Available at: https://www. euroncap.com/en/vehicle-safety/the-ratings-explained/ adult-occupant-protection/lateral-impact/side-pole (accessed 30 April 2020).
11. Side impact mobile deformable barrier. Testing protocol. European new car assessment programme (Euro NCAP), 2020. 24 p.
12. Full width frontal impact. Testing protocol. European new car assessment programme (Euro NCAP), 2019. 29 p.
13. Full Width Rigid Barrier. Available at: https:// www.euroncap.com/en/vehicle-safety/the-ratings-explained/adult-occupant-protection/frontal-impact/fullwidth-rigid-barrier (accessed 30 April 2020).
14. Offset deformable barrier frontal impact. Testing protocol. European new car assessment programme (Euro NCAP), 2018. 31 p.
Review
For citations:
Viunov T.A., Solopov D.Yu. The relevance of creating a methodology analysis to assess the passive safety of armored civil vehicles. Trudy NAMI. 2021;(1):59-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51187/0135-3152-2021-1-59-67